Kishwar Naheed Essay

She conveys that wo manpower were unwanted and were non cargond for. In particular female infants were seen as a financial burden to an Indian family as they were discriminated from working and were non allowed to ease up an education. Naheed emphasises that she snarl as if she was in the family for no purpose. masculine infants were seen as the family gaining prosperity, they were celebrated and it was a boon to be proud of. The opening of the stanza overstrung with glass immediately tells the ref that this is a luxurious place or arrogant. The news line of battle Brash is ironic as it arsehole mean white faced.The harsh vowel of the assonance helps the subscriber to suggest the poets displeasure. The simile and head rhyme of the phrase fl be like a flag conveys the throw that the restaurant asserts itself, even in its name. The enunciate flag suggests that the people who set up a flag, drive home conquered someone elses land. This talllights the idea of when th e whites stole the land of southwestern Africa. Flaring suggests that the whites atomic number 18 bragging to the concourse (blacks) about their superior modus vivendi and it conveys Afrikas anger as this links to the image of heat used earlier in stanza two anger of my eyes. The simile prophylactic at the gatepost suggest that the restaurant is reserved exclusively for white people. The throws are glum the bulk (blacks. ) He explains that even though at that place is No marking displayed removed the whites only auberge and Apartheid was supposed to be put to an end. The guard is replaced instead of the sign as they block the messes (blacks) from entrance the haute cuisine. Therefore, Afrika gives a clear image to the reader that Apartheid still exists.In I am non that char Kishawar Naheed attempts to redefine the man- charr affinity and address the situation she faces in her free-and-easy life of exploitation and oppression. It is illustrated in the de delayry Now it is era for me to flower free. The alliteration gives the impression that she wants to fight back and does non want to brisk restricted anymore. The voice communication Now and free shows when she wants to redefine the man-woman relationship. Moreover, she explains how she wants to live like. Naheed wants a life with no restrictions and for workforce and women to be case-hardened equally.The message in the poesy is that men and women are non always tempered equally and how there is still sexism and discrimination. In particular, women are non dominated by men and men are treated with prestige and power. The rime helps her express her thoughts and feels. Afrikas row are ambiguous we know where we belong. This perhaps emphasises that the sight (blacks) know that they are discriminated from entering the inn as there is a guard at the gate post. The use of the pronoun we emphasises that he banks that his identity belongs with the masses (blacks.) The single lift o n all(prenominal) shelve line of business with the working mans cafe. As a single rose symbolisationises high quality lifestyle or perfection. It could in addition mean the arrogant wealth that was amongst the mass poverty at the time. In the speech communication My motherhood Naheed conveys that women were born to nurture and care. On the other hand, the men in her partnership have stolen this substantial and amazing demonstrate from them. Instead women are forced to be voiceless, obedient and were below the belt treated as servants due to the male dominance. My commitment suggests that her hubby and her father took away her loyalty and treated her unfairly.Naheed is aware that she has the right to achieve her loyalty once more. In the fifth stanza the poet uses the address bunny girl chows to convey the masses (blacks) unretentive lifestyle in the working mans cafe. Bunny chows was cheap at the time and a common local morsel of a poor mans hamburger it is a stark line of merchandise with haute cuisine. In the restaurant there are plastic tables top, this suggests the poor lifestyle the masses had. The plastic tables top suggests that there is no tablecloth and they felt incomplete, empty and it must have been uncomfortable to eat on.Wipe your fingers on your jeans gives the impression that there is nowhere to subsequentlymath ones hands after eating or a waver to wipe hands. Afrika uses direct imagery to show the life of the masses (blacks. ) Kishwar suggests that women do non have self respect. This is evident in The woman on the poster one-half naked. Naheed is commenting on how men view women as objects or for sexual pleasure. She wants this view to change. The disembodied spirit No, no I am not that woman emphasises that Naheed is not a woman who is obedient, subservient and does not want to lift any arguments or disagreements with anything the men verbalize.The repetition of no shows that she is certain on her transactions and untroubledly disagrees with how many women in the Asian tillage are living. Afrika uses the haggle male child again to show that the appearance of partition sestetsome brings back memories of his childhood when the Apartheid system existed. He does not feel independent as he feels like a boy and commits he is following the whites like how a child is with their parents. Hands burn emphasises his anger against the system and his urge to destroy the symbol of segregation. Afrika repeats the title vigours changed at the ending of the poem.He conveys that even though Apartheid has been Abolished, the masses (blacks) are still treated inferior. The final stanza shows his anger and disappointment of the sparing division betwixt the whites and the masses (blacks) and conveys that the connection has not changed at all. The layout of zippos changed is set out in 8 short lines in each of the six stanzas. The layout creates a sense of control as he is clear on what he is feel ing and no sudden anger is introduced at any point in the poem. His anger increases gradually within each line.The poet makes his argument straight forward by emphasising his feelings in a calm manner. In the first stanza the use of imagery makes the reader feel as if they are in the poets shoes. This makes it clear and easy to conceive how life was like for Tatumkhulu Afrika. This is illustrated in the words Small round hard s bankers bills snatch under my heels. It makes it easy to imagine the masses (blacks) unpleasant and unfortunate lifestyle. The structure of I am not that woman is informal. The layout of the stanzas do not fit in a regular pattern and none of the words rhyme with each other.The free sleek structure shows how resolved Naheed is about her argument. This conveys that vigor empennage change the way she is and zero will hold her back. Even by the simple rules of poetry. It emphasises how infatuated she is towards emancipation. Furthermore, she is protest ing about women having gravel to equal opportunities and rights as men and women should not be treated as if they are worthless or disempowered. It is seen in the words my loyalty. The tones between Nothings changed and I am not that woman are very different. Kishwar Naheeds tone in I am not that woman is very calm, but firm.Her steady tone conveys that she has control over what is being utter by repeatedly claiming I not that woman. Tatumkhulu Afrikas tone contrasts compared to Naheeds. In Nothings changed the poet seems to be increasing his animosity within each line as he sees more things that have not changed even though Apartheid was abolished. Moreover, he is feeling angry because he had not been to District six for many years. In-conclusion, I believe that Kishwar Naheed in I am not that woman argument is stronger as the poem relates more to her lifestyle, cultural beliefs and traditional value about what she has experienced as a woman herself.Naheed clearly explains tha t wants equality between men and women. Moreover, she does not want to live a typical lifestyle of an Asiatic and leaves the reader in hope that there is a chance of change. However I believe that Tatumkhulu Afrika argument in Nothings changed. Is not as strong as Naheeds as he leaves the reader feeling helpless and has not attempted to change his lifestyle as much as Naheed has in vigours changed. Afrika has allowed the whites to treat the masses (blacks) unfairly because he was not as located or eager as Naheed.He mainly just agreed how nobodys changed however, Naheed believes that no one can stop or change her views. This is wherefore I strongly believe Naheedss argument is more effective. I believe that Naheeds argument will decease more powerful if the majority of women did not accept the cultural beliefs of a obedient Asian housewife and they were all determined to fight for equality. By women taking action as a group by giving their views and speaking the men whiteth orn realise that women are treated unfairly, and their lifestyle may change once they have taken action.